Zhang Wang Fast Approximate Quantiles Algorithm in Rust. Paper
Add this to your Cargo.toml:
toml
[dependencies]
zw-fast-quantile = "0.2"
then you are good to go. If you are using Rust 2015 you have to extern crate zw-fast-quantile to your crate root as well.
There are two implementations in this library: FixedSizeEpsilonSummary is with the size of the stream known before hand, and UnboundEpsilonSummary is for the stream with unknown size. You can adjust the error rate epsilon of your own to trade-off between space and accuracy.
```rust let epsilon = 0.1; let n = 10; let mut s = FixedSizeEpsilonSummary::new(n, epsilon); for i in 1..=n { s.update(i); }
let ans = s.query(0.0); let expected = 1; assert!(expected == ans); ```
```rust let epsilon = 0.1; let n = 10; let mut s = UnboundEpsilonSummary::new(epsilon); for i in 1..=n { s.update(i); }
let ans = s.query(0.0); let expected = 1; assert!(expected == ans); ```
We benchmark against GK01 implemented in quantiles. To test the UPDATE, we insert 5000 values in order with error rate of 0.01. GK01 is roughly 2.6x slower than ZW.
zw unbound quantile update
time: [60.780 us 60.855 us 60.936 us]
change: [-1.4032% -0.9510% -0.5005%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Change within noise threshold.
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
6 (6.00%) high severe
``` gk quantile update time: [156.84 us 157.02 us 157.24 us] change: [-0.1907% -0.0503% +0.0969%] (p = 0.50 > 0.05) No change in performance detected. Found 11 outliers among 100 measurements (11.00%) 6 (6.00%) high mild 5 (5.00%) high severe
```
As for the query time, we query 11 quantiles from 0.0, 0.1 ... 1.0. GK01 is about 1.5x slower than ZW.
zw unbound quantile query
time: [229.62 ns 230.16 ns 230.77 ns]
change: [+1.3422% +1.8105% +2.2504%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has regressed.
Found 11 outliers among 100 measurements (11.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
8 (8.00%) high severe
gk quantile query time: [350.21 ns 350.48 ns 350.76 ns]
change: [-0.4638% -0.3109% -0.1670%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Change within noise threshold.
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
1 (1.00%) low severe
2 (2.00%) high mild
5 (5.00%) high severe