text
_
_ _ ___ _____ ___| |_ ___
| | | | | .'| '_| -_|
|___|_|_|_|_|_|__,|_,_|___|
Work in progress
unmake is a makefile linter that promotes extreme portability.
Too many makefiles online are restricted to building only as Works On My Machine^TM.
unmake bucks this trend, encouraging the makefile author to think more critically about what level of platform support they want for their software builds.
Do you want to be able to build your software on macOS? On Linux? On FreeBSD? On Windows (Command Prompt, PowerShell, and/or WSL)? On fish terminals?
All of the above?
unmake can help to catch vendor-lock issues earlier in the SDLC process. So that your apps can build more reliably, for more contributors to enjoy.
```console $ cd examples
$ unmake Makefile; echo "$?" 0
$ unmake bsd/makefile; echo "$?" error at 1:16: expected one of " ", "$(", "${", ":", "t", [^ (' ' | 't' | ':' | ';' | '#' | 'r' | 'n')] 1 ```
See unmake -h for more options.
https://crates.io/crates/unmake
https://docs.rs/unmake/latest/unmake/
https://github.com/mcandre/unmake/releases
console
$ cargo install --force --path .
The unmake linter serves several purposes.
unmake provides a strict replacement for make -n, in case the local make implementation has BSD, GNU, etc. extensions. unmake encourages validating makefiles for syntactic wholeness as part of their projects' linter suites, before any tasks are actually run.
unmake encourages long or subtle shell snippets to be moved to dedicated shell script files, where they are more amenable to scanning with shell script linters. Most linters for common shell snippet wrapping languages (e.g., Ansible, Dockerfile, makefile, Vagrantfile, various CI/CD pipelines) perform very limited scanning for potential flaws in the embedded snippets, compared with linters that specifically scan shell script files.
unmake discourages vendor locking in makefile scripts. Numerous makefiles online assume a highly specific development environment. For example, assuming that (GNU) findutils, (GNU) sed, (GNU) awk, (non-PowerShell) curl are installed, with a GNU bash or zsh user interpreter, on a GNU/Linux operating system. So the typical makefile is likely to fail for (non-WSL) Windows users, or macOS users, or FreeBSD users, and so on. Ideally, our makefiles strive for portability, so that our projects can be enjoyed on a wider variety of computers.
make is a natural candidate for working around limitations in provisioning scripts. For example, go mod / cargo do not track linters or other dev dependencies, and sh defaults to ignoring errors during provisioning. make's default semantics prepare it well for provisioning and other activities. make can do many things! unmake helps it do them better.
unmake follows a stiff reading of the POSIX make standard:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/make.html
Briefly, characters in makefiles that are explicitly rejected by the standard, may be treated as parse errors. Implementation-defined behavior, undefined behavior, and certain ill-advised syntax, may be treated as parse errors.
Common examples of makefile syntax that
\r) and Windows CRLF (\r\n) line endings are out of spec. If you have a need to contribute to projects with makefiles from a Windows machine, configure your text editor to use LF (\n) line endings (and a final LF as well).\t) at the beginning of rule commands, are out of spec.\\ \n) is out of spec.\\\n<eof>), are out of spec.=1) are out of spec.A) are out of spec.") are out of spec.include...\\\n) are out of spec.Certain extensions beyond the POSIX make subset, such as GNU-isms, or BSD-isms, etc., may also trigger parse errors.
Repeat: This is a linter focusing on extreme portability. We break things in testing, so that your software breaks less often in production.
Coming soon.
We do our best to catch POSIX make violations, but some may slip by. For example:
include directivesmake script execution(None)
For more details on developing crit itself, see DEVELOPMENT.md.
FreeBSD