tophat

crates.io Released API docs CI

A small, pragmatic, and flexible async HTTP server library. Currently in beta.

Cargo.toml: tophat = "0.2.0"

The goal is to be low-level and small enough to work with different async runtimes and not dictate user architecture, while having enough convenience functions to still easily build a REST api. More library than framework.

Also, this: rust async fn handler<W>(_req: Request, resp_wtr: ResponseWriter<W>) -> Result<ResponseWritten, Glitch> where W: AsyncRead + AsyncWrite + Clone + Send + Sync + Unpin + 'static, { // Default `send` is 200 OK let done = resp_wtr.send()?; // Do things here after resp is written, if you like Ok(done) }

instead of: ```rust async fn handler(req:Request) -> Result { Ok(Response::empty()) }

``` Don't be scared away by the generics and trait bounds! They won't bite! (probably)

Features

Correct handling of the HTTP protocol is a priority.

Upcoming features: - Examples, with integrations. - Client?

Long term: - HTTP/2

Example

Using smol as the async runtime. Example is single-threaded, see smol docs for how to make a multi-threaded executor. ```rust use smol::{Async, Task}; use std::net::TcpListener; use piper::Arc; use tophat::server::accept;

fn main() -> Result<(), Box> { let listener = Async::::bind("127.0.0.1:9999")?;

smol::run(async {
    loop {
        let (stream, _) = listener.accept().await?;
        let stream = Arc::new(stream);

        let task = Task::spawn(async move {
            let serve = accept(stream, |_req, resp_wtr| async {
                resp_wtr.send().await
            }).await;

            if let Err(err) = serve {
                eprintln!("Error: {}", err);
            }

        });

        task.detach();
    }
})

} ```

Philosophy

I wouldn't consider this a batteries-included framework which tries to make every step easy. There are conveniences, but overall tophat is pretty minimal. For those who don't like boilerplate, another framework would probably work better. Users of tophat need to be familiar async runtimes, setting up a TCP stream, Arc, traits, generics, etc. Tophat won't hold your hand.

In exchange, tophat provides more transparency and more control. Tophat won't dictate how to structure your app, it should play nicely with your architecture.

And if you want to know what tophat is doing under the hood, the code is meant to be simple and straightforward (Hopefully this also leads to better compile times!).

Inspiration

I was inspired to write tophat because: - I wanted to have an async https server which was not tied to an async ecosystem and - I saw this github issue on using a ResponseWriter instead of returning Response: https://github.com/hyperium/hyper/issues/2181

Thanks

Especially to async-h1, whose eye for structure and design I appreciate, and whose code base tophat is built from. And to hyper, whose devotion to performance and correctness is inspiring, and whose basic http libraries tophat has incorporated.

License

Licensed under either of

at your option.