An OpenPGP certificate linter.
This program checks for and can fix issues with OpenPGP certificates. The current focus is on the use of SHA-1, which has been [successfully attacked], and was [deprecated by NIST] in 2011:
Since 2005 SHA-1 has not been considered secure against well-funded opponents, as of 2010 many organizations have recommended its replacement. NIST formally deprecated use of SHA-1 in 2011 and disallowed its use for digital signatures in 2013. As of 2020, attacks against SHA-1 are as practical as against MD5; as such, it is recommended to remove SHA-1 from products as soon as possible and use instead SHA-256 or SHA-3. Replacing SHA-1 is urgent where it's used for signatures.
This program checks for the following issues:
sq-keyring-linter can fix all three of these issues in a
straightforward manner:
$ gpg --export-secret-key 4BE50C526C743502 | cargo run -- --fix | gpg --import
Certificate 4BE50C526C743502 is not valid under the standard policy
Certificate 4BE50C526C743502 contains a User ID ("SHA1 User ID, SHA256 Subkeys <sha1-user-id-sha256-subkeys@example.org>") protected by SHA-1
Certificate 4BE50C526C743502, key CC6387BFA4D9263D uses a SHA-1-protected binding signature.
Examined 1 certificate.
0 certificates are invalid and were not linted. (GOOD)
1 certificate was linted.
1 of the 1 linted certificates (100%) has at least one issue. (BAD)
1 certificate has at least one non-revoked User IDs:
1 has at least one User IDs protected by SHA-1. (BAD)
1 has all User IDs protected by SHA-1. (BAD)
1 certificate has at least one non-revoked, live subkeys:
1 has at least one non-revoked, live subkeys with a binding signature that uses SHA-1. (BAD)
1 certificate has at least one non-revoked, live, signing-capable subkeys:
0 certificates have at least one non-revoked, live, signing-capable subkeys with a strong binding signature, but a backsig that uses SHA-1. (GOOD)
gpg: key 4BE50C526C743502: "SHA1 User ID, SHA256 Subkeys <sha1-user-id-sha256-subkeys@example.org>" 2 new signatures
gpg: key 4BE50C526C743502: secret key imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: new signatures: 2
gpg: secret keys read: 1
gpg: secret keys unchanged: 1
(The diagnostics and the summary are printed to stderr; any fixed
keys are printed to stdout and encoded using ASCII Armor.)
If you run it again, no issues will be detected:
$ gpg --export-secret-key 4BE50C526C743502 | cargo run -- --fix | gpg --import
Examined 1 certificate.
No issues found (see `/tmp/keyring-linter/debug/sq-keyring-linter --help` for a list of issues that are checked for).
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
You can examine the signatures that sq-keyring-linter creates using,
for instance, pgpdump:
$ gpg --export-secret-key 4BE50C526C743502 | cargo run -- --fix | pgpdump
...
In our experience, Sequoia's output is a bit more readable. You can
either use sq packet dump or
https://dump.sequoia-pgp.org/.
You can check whether one or more OpenPGP certificates have issues as follows:
$ dpkg -l debian-keyring
...
ii debian-keyring 2020.09.24
$ cargo run -- /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
...
Examined 885 certificates.
1 certificate is invalid and was not linted. (BAD)
884 certificates were linted.
207 of the 884 linted certificates (23%) have at least one issue. (BAD)
884 certificates have at least one non-revoked User IDs:
169 have at least one User IDs protected by SHA-1. (BAD)
106 have all User IDs protected by SHA-1. (BAD)
836 certificates have at least one non-revoked, live subkeys:
160 have at least one non-revoked, live subkeys with a binding signature that uses SHA-1. (BAD)
230 certificates have at least one non-revoked, live, signing-capable subkeys:
10 certificates have at least one non-revoked, live, signing-capable subkeys with a strong binding signature, but a backsig that uses SHA-1. (BAD)
From the above output, we can see that the current Debian keyring has 885 certificates. One certificate is considered invalid by Sequoia and was skipped. Of the rest, 207 (23%) use SHA-1 in some way. These should be fixed.