Portable relative UTF-8 paths for Rust.
This provide a module analogous to [std::path], with the following characteristics:
/
), regardless of
platform.On top of this we support many path-like operations that guarantee portable behavior.
Add the following to your Cargo.toml
:
toml
relative-path = "1.6.1"
This library includes serde support that can be enabled with the serde
feature.
std::path
a portability hazard?Path representations differ across platforms.
"c:\"
) and backslash (\
) as a separator./
) as
a separator.If we use PathBuf
, Storing paths like this in a manifest would happily
allow our applications to build and run on one platform, but potentially not
others.
Consider the following manifest:
```rust use std::path::PathBuf; use serde::{Serialize, Deserialize};
struct Manifest { source: PathBuf, } ```
Which represents this TOML file:
```toml
source = "C:\path\to\source" ```
Assuming "C:\\path\\to\\source"
is a legal path on Windows, this will
happily run for one platform when checked into source control but not
others.
Since [RelativePath] strictly uses /
as a separator it avoids this issue.
Anything non-slash will simply be considered part of a distinct component.
Conversion to [Path] may only happen if it is known which path it is relative to through the [topath] or [tological_path] functions. This is where the relative part of the name comes from.
```rust use relative_path::RelativePath; use std::path::Path;
// topath unconditionally concatenates a relative path with its base: let relativepath = RelativePath::new("../foo/./bar"); let fullpath = relativepath.topath("C:\"); asserteq!(full_path, Path::new("C:\..\foo\.\bar"));
// tologicalpath tries to apply the logical operations that the relative // path corresponds to: let relativepath = RelativePath::new("../foo/./bar"); let fullpath = relativepath.tologicalpath("C:\baz"); asserteq!(full_path, Path::new("C:\foo\bar")); ```
This would permit relative paths to portably be used in project manifests or configurations. Where files are referenced from some specific, well-known point in the filesystem.
toml
source = "path/to/source"
The fixed manifest would look like this:
```rust use relative_path::RelativePathBuf; use serde::{Serialize, Deserialize};
pub struct Manifest { source: RelativePathBuf, } ```
When two relative paths are compared to each other, their exact component makeup determines equality.
```rust use relative_path::RelativePath;
assert_ne!( RelativePath::new("foo/bar/../baz"), RelativePath::new("foo/baz") ); ```
Using platform-specific path separators to construct relative paths is not supported.
Path separators from other platforms are simply treated as part of a component:
```rust use relative_path::RelativePath;
assert_ne!( RelativePath::new("foo/bar"), RelativePath::new("foo\bar") );
asserteq!(1, RelativePath::new("foo\bar").components().count()); asserteq!(2, RelativePath::new("foo/bar").components().count()); ```
To see if two relative paths are equivalent you can use [normalize]:
```rust use relative_path::RelativePath;
assert_eq!( RelativePath::new("foo/bar/../baz").normalize(), RelativePath::new("foo/baz").normalize(), ); ```
While relative paths avoid the most egregious portability issues, namely that absolute paths will work equally unwell on all platforms. We do not avoid all.
This section tries to document additional portability issues that we know about.
[RelativePath], similarly to [Path], makes no guarantees that the components represented in them makes up legal file names. While components are strictly separated by slashes, we can still store things in path components which may not be used as legal paths on all platforms.
NUL
is not permitted on unix platforms - this is a terminator in C-based
filesystem APIs. Slash (/
) is also used as a path separator.A relative path that actually contains a platform-specific absolute path will result in a nonsensical path being generated.
```rust use relative_path::RelativePath; use std::path::Path;
if cfg!(windows) { asserteq!( Path::new("foo\c:\bar\baz"), RelativePath::new("c:\bar\baz").topath("foo") ); }
if cfg!(unix) { asserteq!( Path::new("foo/bar/baz"), RelativePath::new("/bar/baz").topath("foo") ); } ```
This is intentional in order to cause an early breakage when a platform
encounters paths like "foo/c:\\bar\\baz"
to signal that it is a
portability hazard. On Unix it's a bit more subtle with ""foo/bar/baz""
,
since the leading slash (/
) will simply be ignored. The hope is that it
will be more probable to cause an early error unless a compatible relative
path also exists.
License: MIT/Apache-2.0