Despite the name styling, there are no generic arguments anywhere in the library and I'm so disappointed about that fact. ;_;
Protofish is a decoder focused on decoding arbitrary protocol buffer messages with error recovery. Its primary use case is decoding gRPC mesages in proxide based on .proto-files supplied by the user at runtime.
```rust use protofish::{Context, Value, UnknownValue}; use bytes::Bytes;
let context = Context::parse(&[r#" syntax = "proto3"; package Proto;
message Request { string kind = 1; } message Response { int32 distance = 1; } service Fish { rpc Swim( Request ) returns ( Response ); } "#]).unwrap();
let service = context.getservice("Proto.Fish").unwrap(); let rpc = service.rpcby_name("Swim").unwrap();
let input = rpc.input.message.decode(b"\x0a\x05Perch", &context); asserteq!(input.fields[0].number, 1); asserteq!(input.fields[0].value, Value::String(String::from("Perch")));
let output = rpc.output.message.decode(b"\x08\xa9\x46", &context); asserteq!(output.fields[0].number, 1); asserteq!(output.fields[0].value, Value::Int32(9001)); ```
protoc
.There are couple of other crate in the Rust ecosystem for handling Protocol
Buffer messages. Most of these crates focus on compile time code generation
for generating message types for runtime serialization. Most of these crates
also depend on protoc
for the actual proto-file parsing.
The [quick-protobuf] project has a stand-alone proto-file parser: [pb-rs].
Unfortunately that parser is missing support for the full proto-file syntax (at
least stream
requests and responses were unsupported in rpc
definitions at
the time of writing this README).
Protofish uses PEG based on the published Protocol Buffers Version 3 Language Specification. While that specification is slightly inaccurate, writing the grammar based on the official EBNF syntax provided an easy way to build a comprehensive parser.
A hand crafted Nom-based parser might be faster, but in most cases there is no need for high performance when reading proto-files. Proxide for example does this once at program startup.
The most pressing issue currently is support for packed repeated fields. This means all repeated primitive fields show up as invalid fields currently. Support for this is incoming once the base features have been refined.
Protofish currently ignores all option statements in the proto-file. The support is coming with the packed repeated fields (since packing is defined as an option).
import
statements.. or notProtofish ignores import
statements in the proto-files. Building a
comprehensive decoding context depends on processing all files that contain the
required types. This means whichever files the import
statements refer to
need to be passed to protofish for parsing anyway. As a result there's little
need to parse the import
statements early.