lsp-document
Helpers to convert between LSP representations of text documents and Rust strings.
LSP uses UTF16-encoded strings while Rust's strings are UTF8-encoded. This means that text offsets in LSP and in Rust are different: - LSP offsets are in 16-bit code-units and each character is either 1 or 2 of those, - Rust strings are indexed in bytes and each character takes from 1 to 4 bytes.
To ensure that LSP client and server "talk" about the same part of a text document we need a translation layer.
This crate provides such a layer.
See the docs for more details.
```rust use lspdocument::{TextMap, TextAdapter, Pos, IndexedText}; use lsptypes::Position;
// Character width // U16: 1111111111111 1111111111 1 11 1 1 111111111 21 // U8: 1111111111111 1222122221 1 13 3 3 111111111 41 // U8 offset // 0 1 2 3 4 5 // 0123456789012 3468013579 0 12 5 8 123456789 04 let text = "Hello, world!\nКак дела?\r\n做得好\nThis is 💣!"; let text = IndexedText::new(text); // // Examples of using TextMap methods // // Pos of 💣 from its offset asserteq!(text.offsettopos(50).unwrap(), Pos::new(3, 8)); // Raw line range info asserteq!(text.linerange(2).unwrap(), Pos::new(2, 0)..Pos::new(2, 10)); // Extracting part of text between two positions asserteq!(text.substr(Pos::new(1, 7)..Pos::new(1, 15)).unwrap(), "дела");
//
// Example of using TextAdapter methods
//
// Pos of !
after 💣
asserteq!(text.lsppostopos(&Position::new(3, 10)).unwrap(), Pos::new(3, 12));
asserteq!(text.postolsppos(&Pos::new(3, 12)).unwrap(), Position::new(3, 10));
```
String
s for text manipulationCurrently, the crate works for str
-like representation of text. UTF8-encoded strings are efficiently packed in memory, which means:
1. 👍 There's low memory overhead of storing these strings.
2. 👍 The contents is contiguous in memory, hence random access and iteration
over chars are fast (the latter is important for conversion between lsp and
native positions).
3. 👎 Making changes to strings is slow as it requires time proportional to the length of the string.
Most likely, the performance impact of 3. won't be a problem as we query
data much more often than we change it (in the context of LSP servers). So,
using String
s should be just fine for a lot of applications.
However, having an implementation backed by a Rope
wouldn't hurt (although this is not a priority at the moment).