A simple set of macros to aid testing with try operations.
This crate allows for easily writing functions and expression where ? is
automatically translated into .unwrap().
It is syntactically desirable to use ?. This however causes issues during
testing, because a failing test lacks a stack trace which helps you track
down the exact line that errored.
```rust
fn testcase() -> Result<(), &'static str> { let value = function()?; asserteq!(value, 42); Ok(()) } ```
By default you'd get this when function()? errors:
``
---- test_case stdout ----
Error: "bad"
thread 'test_case' panicked at 'assertion failed:(left == right)
left:1,
right:0: the test returned a termination value with a non-zero status code (1) which indicates a failure', <path>\library\test\src\lib.rs:185:5
note: run withRUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures: test_case ```
Note how there's no information on which line the test failed on.
But with the inclusion of #[hodoku::function] you get this:
```rust
fn testcase() -> Result<(), &'static str> { let value = function()?; asserteq!(value, 42); Ok(()) } ```
``
---- test_case stdout ----
thread 'test_case' panicked at 'calledResult::unwrap()on anErrvalue: "bad"', tests\failing.rs:8:27
note: run withRUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures: test_case ```
This is exactly why we want to make use of .unwrap() instead of the try
operator tests. It indicates the exact line that errored.
Use of #[hodoku::function].
```rust
fn hello() { let value = Some(42)?; assert_eq!(value, 42); }
hello(); ```
Unwrapping expressions:
rust
let value = hodoku::expr!(Some(42)?);
assert_eq!(value, 42);
License: MIT/Apache-2.0