futures-buffered

This project provides a single future structure: FuturesUnorderedBounded.

Much like futures::FuturesUnordered, this is a thread-safe, Pin friendly, lifetime friendly, concurrent processing stream.

The is different to FuturesUnordered in that FuturesUnorderedBounded has a fixed capacity for processing count. This means it's less flexible, but produces better memory efficiency.

Benchmarks

Speed

Running 65536 100us timers with 256 concurrent jobs in a single threaded tokio runtime:

FuturesUnordered time: [420.47 ms 422.21 ms 423.99 ms] FuturesUnorderedBounded time: [366.02 ms 367.54 ms 369.05 ms]

Memory usage

Running 512000 Ready<i32> futures with 256 concurrent jobs.

``` FuturesUnordered count: 1024002 alloc: 40960144 B dealloc: 40960000 B

FuturesUnorderedBounded count: 2 alloc: 8264 B dealloc: 0 B ```

Conclusion

As you can see, FuturesUnorderedBounded massively reduces you memory overhead while providing a small performance gain. Perfect for if you want a fixed batch size

Examples

```rust // create a tcp connection let stream = TcpStream::connect("example.com:80").await?;

// perform the http handshakes let (mut rs, conn) = conn::handshake(stream).await?; runtime.spawn(conn);

/// make http request to example.com and read the response fn makereq(rs: &mut SendRequest) -> ResponseFuture { let req = Request::builder() .header("Host", "example.com") .method("GET") .body(Body::from("")) .unwrap(); rs.sendrequest(req) }

// create a queue that can hold 128 concurrent requests let mut queue = FuturesUnorderedBounded::new(128);

// start up 128 requests for _ in 0..128 { queue.push(makereq(&mut rs)); } // wait for a request to finish and start another to fill its place - up to 1024 total requests for _ in 128..1024 { queue.next().await; queue.push(makereq(&mut rs)); } // wait for the tail end to finish for _ in 0..128 { queue.next().await; } ```

```rust use futures::future::join_all;

async fn foo(i: u32) -> u32 { i }

let futures = vec![foo(1), foo(2), foo(3)];

asserteq!(joinall(futures).await, [1, 2, 3]); ```