dependent_view is a rust library providing simple wrappers around the Rc and Arc types, imbuing them with the capability to provide "views" of non-owned structs to separate components of a system. 
Add this to your Cargo.toml
[dependencies]
dependent_view="1.0.0"
and this to your crate root:
```
extern crate dependent_view; ```
The library provides two main structs DependentRc and DependentArc which changes the result of the view type (between std::rc::Weak or std::sync::Weak).
To obtain a Weak<Trait> from these objects, use the macros to_view!() or to_view_sync() respectively.
It is checked at compile time that the type T wihtin DependentRc<T> impl's the trait you want to obtain a view for (see example).
These dependent types provide a different kind of ownership delegation as compared to standard Rc's or Box's.
A DependentRc should be viewed as the single owner of it's contained type, however unlike a Box, it allows users to generate multiple runtime managed Weak<Trait> references to the object (for each Trait impl'd by the contained entity) - these Weak references cease to be upgradable once the source DependantRc is dropped.
Assume we have the following traits: ``` trait Dance { fn dance(&self); }
trait Prance {
    fn prance(&self);
}
and some structs which impl the traits:
struct Dancer {id: usize}
impl Dance for Dancer {fn dance(&self) {println!("D{:?}", self.id);}}
impl Prance for Dancer {fn prance(&self)  {println!("P{:?}", self.id);}}
struct Prancer {id: usize}
impl Dance for Prancer {fn dance(&self) {println!("D{:?}", self.id);}}
impl Prance for Prancer {fn prance(&self)  {println!("P{:?}", self.id);}}
We can create `DependentRc` using the new function:
use dependent_view::rc::*;
let mut dancer = DependentRc::new(Dancer { id: 0 }); let mut prancer = DependentRc::new(Prancer { id: 0 }); ```
We can use these DependentRc's to create non-owned views of our structs:
```
let dancerdanceview : Weak
let prancerdanceview : Weak
We can then share these views to other components, and not have to worry about managing their deletion:
```
    let mut dancers : Vec
{
    let mut dancer = DependentRc::new(Dancer { id: 0 });
    let mut prancer = DependentRc::new(Prancer { id: 0 });
    dancers.push(to_view!(dancer));
    prancers.push(to_view!(dancer));
    dancers.push(to_view!(prancer));
    prancers.push(to_view!(prancer));
    for (dancer_ref, prancer_ref) in dancers.iter().zip(prancers.iter()) {
         dancer_ref.upgrade().unwrap().dance(); 
         prancer_ref.upgrade().unwrap().prance(); 
    }
   // at this point, dancer and prancer are dropped, invalidating the views
}
for (dancer_ref, prancer_ref) in dancers.iter().zip(prancers.iter()) {
   assert!(dancer_ref.upgrade().is_none());
   assert!(prancer_ref.upgrade().is_none());
}
Also, it is a compile time error to attempt to produce a trait view of a struct when the underlying struct doesn't implement the trait:
struct Bad { id: usize }
let bad = DependentRc::new(Bad { id: 0 });
let badview : Weak
Seeexample.rs` for the full source.