This project is developed and maintained by the HAL team.
A critical section that works everywhere!
When writing software for embedded systems, it's common to use a "critical section" as a basic primitive to control concurrency. A critical section is essentially a mutex global to the whole process, that can be acquired by only one thread at a time. This can be used to protect data behind mutexes, to emulate atomics in targets that don't support them, etc.
There's a wide range of possible implementations depending on the execution environment:
- For bare-metal single core, disabling interrupts globally.
- For bare-metal multicore, acquiring a hardware spinlock and disabling interrupts globally.
- For bare-metal using a RTOS, it usually provides library functions for acquiring a critical section, often named "scheduler lock" or "kernel lock".
- For bare-metal running in non-privileged mode, usually some system call is needed.
- For std
targets, acquiring a global std::sync::Mutex
.
Libraries often need to use critical sections, but there's no universal API for this in core
. This leads
library authors to hardcode them for their target, or at best add some cfg
s to support a few targets.
This doesn't scale since there are many targets out there, and in the general case it's impossible to know
which critical section implementation is needed from the Rust target alone. For example, the thumbv7em-none-eabi
target
could be cases 1-4 from the above list.
This crate solves the problem by providing this missing universal API.
acquire
, release
and with
that libraries can directly use.cortex-m
, riscv
), RTOS bindings, or HALs for multicore chips to supply the correct implementation so that all the crates in the dependency tree automatically use it.First, add a dependency on a crate providing a critical section implementation. Enable the critical-section-*
Cargo feature if required by the crate.
toml
cortex-m = { version = "0.7.6", features = ["critical-section-single-core"]}
Then you can use critical_section::with()
.
```rust use core::cell::Cell; use critical_section::Mutex;
static MY_VALUE: Mutex
critical_section::with(|cs| { // This code runs within a critical section.
// `cs` is a token that you can use to "prove" that to some API,
// for example to a `Mutex`:
MY_VALUE.borrow(cs).set(42);
});
```
If you're writing a library intended to be portable across many targets, simply add a dependency on critical-section
and use critical_section::free
and/or Mutex
as usual.
Do not add any dependency supplying a critical section implementation. Do not enable any critical-section-*
Cargo feature.
This has to be done by the end user, enabling the correct implementation for their target.
Do not enable any Cargo feature in critical-section
.
Crates adding support for a particular architecture, chip or operating system should provide a critical section implementation. It is strongly recommended to gate the implementation behind a feature, so the user can still use another implementation if needed (having two implementations in the same binary will cause linking to fail).
Add the dependency, and a critical-section-*
feature to your Cargo.toml
:
```toml [features]
critical-section-foo = ["critical-section/restore-state-bool"]
[dependencies] critical-section = { version = "1.0", optional = true } ```
Then, provide the critical implementation like this:
``rust
// This is a type alias for the enabled
restore-state-*feature.
// For example, it is
boolif you enable
restore-state-bool`.
use critical_section::RawRestoreState;
struct MyCriticalSection; criticalsection::setimpl!(MyCriticalSection);
unsafe impl critical_section::Impl for MyCriticalSection { unsafe fn acquire() -> RawRestoreState { // TODO }
unsafe fn release(token: RawRestoreState) {
// TODO
}
} ```
If you get an error like these:
not_rust
undefined reference to `_critical_section_1_0_acquire'
undefined reference to `_critical_section_1_0_release'
it is because you (or a library) are using critical_section::with
without providing a critical section implementation.
Make sure you're depending on a crate providing the implementation, and have enabled the critical-section-*
feature in it if required. See the Usage
section above.
The error can also be caused by having the dependency but never use
ing it. This can be fixed by adding a dummy use
:
rust,ignore
use the_cs_impl_crate as _;
If you get errors like these:
not_rust
error: symbol `_critical_section_1_0_acquire` is already defined
it is because you have two crates trying to provide a critical section implementation. You can only have one implementation in a program.
You can use cargo tree --format '{p} {f}'
to view all dependencies and their enabled features. Make sure
that in the whole dependency tree, exactly one implementation is provided.
Check for multiple versions of the same crate as well. For example, check the critical-section-single-core
feature is not enabled for both cortex-m
0.7 and 0.8.
An alternative solution would be to use a CriticalSection
trait, and make all
code that needs acquiring the critical section generic over it. This has a few problems:
Mutex
es in static
variables, and static
s can't
be generic.This work is licensed under either of
at your option.
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.
Contribution to this crate is organized under the terms of the Rust Code of Conduct, the maintainer of this crate, the HAL team, promises to intervene to uphold that code of conduct.