ciid - Chronological Image Identifier

ciid is a utility to derive a chronologically sortable, unique identifier for images.

ciid build status ciid on crates.io

Usually, digital cameras and phones assign file names to images with a sequence of only 4 digits (e.g. IMG_1234.dng). Those names will easily clash for any sufficiently large amount of images.

ciid tackles this problem by deriving a hash from the image buffer. Additionally to being able to derive an identifier that is very unlikely to clash, this hash can later be used to check the integrity of the image content.

Some image processing programs update metadata of files (e.g inline JPEG- previews, tags, modified date). The resulting ciid will be unaffected from those changes, since only the actual image buffer is hashed. This has the nice side-effect that proprietary camera RAW file formats and converted .dng files will yield the same identifier most of the time.

Here's how a resulting identifier looks like:

0A1B2C3D4E-5F6G7H8J9K0M1N2P3Q4R5S6T7V8W9X0Y1Z2A3B4C5D6E7F8G9H00 └───┬────┘ └────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────┘ timestamp hash of image buffer

The first part of the identifier encodes the creation date of the image (a 50-bit timestamp with millisecond precision), while the second part is a hash (SHA-256) based on the contents of the image buffer.

The encoding uses Douglas Crackford's base32 alphabet with the following characters:

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, M, N, P, Q, R, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Z.

Following criteria were considered when choosing the character set:

Installation (via script)

Download and run the installation script:

bash $ curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pablosichert/ciid/master/bin/install.sh | bash

Installation (manually)

Prerequisites

For help with installing the dependencies, have a look at the install script.

Install the ciid binary onto your system via cargo:

bash $ cargo install ciid

Usage

bash $ ciid [FLAGS] <file path>...

Flags

| Short | Long | Description | | ----- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | -h  | --help | Prints help information | | | --rename-file | Renames the file to the derived identifier. Preserves the file extension | | -V | --version  | Prints version information | | | --verify-name | Verifies if the provided file name is equal to the derived identifier |

Options

| Short | Long | Description | | ----- | -------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |   | --print \path}, ${identifier}, ${datetime}, ${timestamp} |

Arguments

| Name | Description | | ---------------- | ------------------ | | \

FAQ

Why not use a more human-readable format for the timestamp?

Why do we encode the timestamp as 0A1B2C3D4E instead of e.g. 2319-11-21 14:22:59.726? The timestamp represents an unambiguous1 single point in time, whereas the date string needs to be contextualized with a time zone. That means that you would either need to annotate the date string with a time zone or change the file name every time you are on a system which uses a different time zone.

Apart from that, the former encoding is significantly more compact.

While unfortunately it's not easy to derive the actual date from the encoded timestamp just by looking at it, you can compare two encoded timestamps chronologically by sorting them alphabetically.

1 ignoring leap-seconds.

Prior Art

The timestamp used in ciid was inspired by ulid.